THE SHELLOW COLLECTION
Jury Instructions By James M. Shellow of Wisconsin
Go to Shellow
Collection Table of Contents
Extortion
1. Defendant Must Have Knowledge Of Extortion
THE SHELLOW COLLECTION
Jury Instructions By James M. Shellow of Wisconsin
1. Defendant Must Have Knowledge Of Extortion
ALERT: Carefully review the Caveats and Disclaimers before using these materials.
SAMPLE INSTRUCTION:
It is __________’s (name of defendant) theory of defense as to Count(s) _____ that, assuming __________ (name of victim) was in fact extorted, __________ (name of defendant) had no knowledge of such extortion and acted not as an extortionist but as an ________ (insert, e.g., attorney and business advisor) to __________ (name of victim).
The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that __________ (name of defendant) had knowledge of an effort to extort __________ (name of victim). If the government has not proven this beyond a reasonable doubt, then, regardless of any other evidence, you must acquit __________ (name of defendant).
AUTHORITIES:
United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 386 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 93 (1977); United States v. Vole, 435 F.2d 774, 776 (7th Cir. 1970); United States v. Phillips, 217 F.2d 435, 440, 442 (7th Cir. 1955).
RELATED SHELLOW MATERIALS:
See also THE SHELLOW COLLECTION: Elements: Knowledge.
RELATED NCJIC MATERIALS:
See generally NCJIC Chapter 47: Knowledge.
See NCJIC 103.10 [Extortion].