HELPFUL CASES APRIL 2007

SELECTED STATE AND FEDERAL CASES FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENSE

    U.S. Supreme Court
    1st Circuit Court of Appeals
    2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
    3rd Circuit Court of Appeals [None this update]
    4th Circuit Court of Appeals 
    5th Circuit Court of Appeals
    6th Circuit Court of Appeals
    7th Circuit Court of Appeals [None this update]
    8th Circuit Court of Appeals 
    9th Circuit Court of Appeals
    10th Circuit Court of Appeals
    11th Circuit Court of Appeals     
    D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals [None this update] 
   
New York Court of Appeals
    Texas Criminal Court of Appeals


Federal Courts (April 1, 2007- April 30, 2007)

Selected Decisions:

U.S. Supreme Court

James v. U.S. (4/18/2007, No. 05-9264) ____ US ____ [127 SCt 1586; 167 LEd2d 532]: Attempted burglary, as defined by Florida law, is a "violent felony" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) for sentencing purposes.

Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman (4/25/2007, No. 05-11284) 2007 U.S. LEXIS 4536: Death sentence reversed where there was a reasonable likelihood that a state trial court's instructions prevented jurors from giving meaningful consideration to constitutionally relevant mitigating evidence.

Brewer v. Quarterman (4/25/2007, No. 05-11287) 2007 U.S. LEXIS 4538: Texas capital sentencing statute impermissibly prevented defendant's jury from giving meaningful consideration and effect to constitutionally relevant mitigating evidence.


1st Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Luisi (4/10/2007, No. 03-1470) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8225: Supplemental instructions, which foreclosed the jury from considering the defendant's superior's role in the asserted government entrapment of defendant, were erroneous.

Owens v. U.S. (4/12/2007, No. 05-1784, No. 05-1785) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8388: Denial of evidentiary hearing was an abuse of discretion since: 1) defendant's allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel were not implausible; 2) closure of jury selection to the public for an entire day without meeting the strict Waller requirements would violate a defendant's right to a public trial; 3) failure to object to such a closure might constitute ineffective assistance of counsel; and 4) denial of a public trial is structural error.


2nd Circuit Court of Appeals

U.S. v. Kaplan (4/11/2007, No. 05-5531) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8363: Judge erred in admitting lay opinion testimony regarding defendant's and other's knowledge of the fraud.


4th Circuit Court of Appeals

U.S. v. Stephens (4/3/2007, No. 05-4668) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7617: Insufficient evidence to corroborate defendant's statement and thereby establish his guilt.


5th Circuit Court of Appeals

U.S. v. Buchanan (4/19/2007, No. 04-41364) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9118: Multiplicity principles violated where defendant committed one act to receive the four images that were the basis of his multiple convictions under 18 USC 2252(a)(2).


6th Circuit Court of Appeals

Ege v. Yukins (4/24/2007, No. 05-2078) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9287: Admission of bite-mark evidence at trial violated her due process right to a fair trial and petitioner demonstrated both "cause" and "prejudice" for her failure to comply with Michigan's contemporaneous objection rule.


8th Circuit Court of Appeals

U.S. v. Kenyon (4/9/2007, No. 06-1693) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8175: Aggravated sexual abuse of a child conviction reversed in part due to an erroneous jury instruction on one count and insufficient evidence on another.


9th Circuit Court of Appeals

U.S. v. Heredia (4/2/2007, No. 03-10585) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7558: District judges are owed the usual degree of deference in deciding when a deliberate ignorance instruction [see U.S. v. Jewell (9th Cir. 1976) 532 F2d 697] is warranted.

U.S. v. Moran (4/2/2007, No. 05-30215, 05-30226) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7560: District court erroneously excluded testimony as to defendants' good faith defense as hearsay and did not provide a reasoned basis for excluding it under Federal Rule of Evidence 403.

U.S. v. Snellenberger (4/3/2007, No. 06-50169) 480 F3d 1187: In the context of criminal sentencing, a minute order is "not a judicial record that can be relied upon" to establish the nature of a prior conviction.

Brazzel v. State of Washington (4/12/2007, No. 05-36145) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8385: After first jury remained silent on attempted murder charge and convicted defendant of a lesser alternative offense, retrial violated double jeopardy/former jeopardy.


10th Circuit Court of Appeals

Fleming v. Evans (4/3/2007, No. 06-6110) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7620: Sufficiently egregious misconduct on the part of a habeas petitioner's counsel may justify equitable tolling of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) limitations period.

Trammell v. McKune (4/12/2007, No. 06-3316) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8394: Prosecution's failure to disclose physical evidence linking third party to the crime violated defendant’s due process rights under Brady.


11th Circuit Court of Appeals

U.S. v. Garey (4/11/2007, No. 05-14631) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8273: Erroneous finding that defendant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.

U.S. v. Orisnord (4/11/2007, No. 05-14659) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8287: Insufficient evidence to sustain firearm conviction.

U.S. v. Ohayon (4/12/2007, No. 05-17045) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8390: Defendant's acquittal on a charge of an attempted drug offense required dismissal of a charge of a drug conspiracy on which the jury was unable to reach a verdict, as the prosecution was collaterally estopped from retrying defendant for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute drugs.

U.S. v. Garcia-Jaimes (4/19/2007, No. 05-14475) 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8963: Gun conviction reversed.


State Courts (April 1, 2007- April 30, 2007)

Selected Decisions:

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Havrish (4/3/2007, No. 31) 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 609: Denial of motion to suppress is reversed where defendant's surrender of the handgun was privileged under the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.



Texas Criminal Court of Appeals

Jones v. State of Texas (4/4/2007, No. PD-0230-06) 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 391: Refusal to permit defense counsel to ask a proper question during voir dire violated the Texas Constitution.

LaPointe v. State of Texas (4/25/2007, No. 1100-06) 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 505: The"hearing" before determining whether to admit evidence of an alleged victim's past sexual history must be an adversarial proceeding.