Admissibility and Weight of Extrajudicial or Pretrial Identification Where Witness Was Unable or Failed to Make In-court Identification, 29 ALR4th 104.

Admissibility, at Criminal Prosecution, of Expert Testimony on Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony, 46 ALR4th 1047.

Admissibility of Evidence of Photographic Identification as Affected by Allegedly Suggestive Identification Procedures, 39 ALR3d 1000.

Admissibility Of Evidence Of Voice Identification Of Defendant As Affected By Allegedly Suggestive Voice Lineup Procedures. 55 ALR5th 423 and Later Case Service.

A Jury Instruction Which Outlines Specific Factors in Evidence Casting Reasonable Doubt on Eyewitness Testimony is Permissible When the Factors are Described in a Neutral, Nonexplanatory Manner (Cal. Sup. Ct. Survey: May - July 1988) Langbord, 16 Pepperdine L.Rev. 492, Jan. 1989.

Evidence of Child -- Corroboration Where Identification at Issue -- Independent Source -- Direction on Functions of Judge and Jury Regarding Corroboration Evidence [Great Britain] Rees and Birch, Crim.L.Rev. 301, May 1988.

Eyewitnesses: Necessity Of, and Prejudicial Effect of Omitting, Cautionary Instruction to Jury as to Reliability Of, or Factors to Be Considered in Evaluating, Eyewitness Identification Testimony, State Cases, 23 ALR4th 1089.

Eyewitness Testimony and the Use of Cautionary Instructions (Symposium on Eyewitness Identification Testimony) Greene, 8 U. of Bridgeport L.Rev. 15, Winter, 1987.

It is Reversible Error to Refuse a Jury Instruction When the Defendant's Identification is Crucial to the Issue of Guilt (Calif. Sup. Ct. Survey Dec. 1986 - Feb. 1987), Coulter, 14 Pepperdine L.Rev. 1070, May 1987.

Requiring Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Identification Evidence at Federal Criminal Trials, Hoffheimer, 80 J.Crim.L. and Criminology 585, Nov. 1989.

Sexual Case -- Identification Evidence -- Guidance as to Direction to Jury [Great Britain], Knapman and Birch, Crim.L.Rev. 745, Nov. 1988.

Sexual Offenses -- Identification in Issue -- Whether Direction on Corroboration Necessary [Great Britain], Birch and Cowan, Crim.L. Rev. 688, Oct. 1988.

Voice Identification: Instructions as to Identification of Accused by His Voice, 70 ALR2d 1019.

THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

VOLUME 18 - CHAPTER 305

The Hobgoblin Of Little Minds? Our Foolish Law of Inconsistent Verdicts, Eric L. Muller, 111 Harv.L.Rev. 771, January 1998.

Inconsistent Jury Verdict Is Reviewable When It Is The Result Of Misleading Jury Instructions (State v. Grey (96) 147 N.J. 4 [685 A2d 923]) Michelle M. Bufano, 27 Seton Hall L. Rev. 845, 1997.

Inconsistency of Criminal Verdict as Between Different Counts of Indictment or Information, 18 ALR3d 259.

Inconsistency of Criminal Verdict with Verdict on Another Indictment or Information Tried at Same Time, 16 ALR3d 866.

Inconsistency of Criminal Verdicts as Between Two or More Defendants Tried Together, 22 ALR3d 717.

THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

VOLUME 18 - CHAPTER 305

Modern Status: Instruction Allowing Presumption or Inference of Guilt from Possession of Recently Stolen Property as Violation of Defendant's Privilege Against Self-incrimination, 88 ALR3d 1178.

Self-incrimination: Instruction Allowing Presumption or Inference of Guilt from Possession of Recently Stolen Property as Violation of Defendant's Privilege Against Self-incrimination, 88 ALR3d 1178.

What Constitutes "Recently" Stolen Property Within Rule Inferring Guilt from Unexplained Possession of Such Property, 89 ALR3d 1202.

Texts:

Cissell, Federal Criminal Trials (Lexis, 5th ed. 1999) § 15-2(b)(8).

Wharton’s Criminal Law, (West, 15th ed. 1993) § 330, p. 277-82.

Wharton’s Criminal Evidence, (West, 14th ed. 1986) § 319, pp. 215-26.

THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

VOLUME 18 - CHAPTER 305

Adverse Presumption or Inference Based on State's Failure to Produce or Examine Informant in Criminal Prosecution--modern Cases, 80 ALR4th 547.

"The Best Interests of the Child"-scrutinizing California's Use of Minors as Police Informants in Drug Cases, 31 McGeorge L. Rev. 777, Spring, 2000, Michael R. Santiago.

Effective Use of Informants and Accomplice Witnesses, 50 S.C. L. Rev. 679, Spring 1999, Ann C. Rowland.

Informants and the Fourth Amendment: a Reconsideration, 74 Wash. U. L.Q. 573, Fall 1996, Tracey Maclin.

Juvenile Informants--a Necessary Evil?, 39 Washburn L.J. 106, Fall 1999, Darci G. Osther.

THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

VOLUME 18 - CHAPTER 305

Annotation, Validity, Construction, and Application of State Statute Criminalizing Possession of Contraband by Individual in Penal or Correctional Institution. 45 ALR5th 767.

Dangerous Places: the Right to Self-defense in Prison and Prison Conditions Jurisprudence, 63 U. Chi. L. Rev. 693, Spring 1996, Anders Kaye.

Illinois v. Perkins: Approving the Use of Police Trickery in Prison to Circumvent Miranda, 21 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 811, Spring, 1990, Charles E. Glennon.

Prison Cells, Leg Restraints, and "Custodial Interrogation": Miranda's Role in Crimes That Occur in Prison, 59 U. Chi. L. Rev. 719, University of Chicago Law Review Spring, 1992 Steve Finizio

Rape and Aids in Prison: on a Collision Course to a New Death Penalty, 30 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 863, Fall, 1997, Richard D. Vetstein.

Rape in Prison and Aids: a Challenge for the Eighth Amendment Framework of Wilson v. Seiter, 44 Stan. L. Rev. 1541, July, 1992, David M. Siegal.

THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

VOLUME 18 - CHAPTER 305

See also NCJIC Research Notes 305.13.4 [Mental Impairment, Etc. To Negate Mens Rea].

Adequacy of Defense Counsel's Representation of Criminal Client Regarding Incompetency, Insanity, and Related Issues, 17 ALR4th 575.

By Reason of Insanity: Special Instruction Required, Reidinger, 75 ABA J. 105, June 1989.

Burden and Sufficiency of Proof of Mental Irresponsibility, 17 ALR3d 146.

Competency to Stand Trial in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings--Cognitive Maturity and the Attorney Client Relationship. V.L. Cowden and G.R. McKee, 33 U. Louisville J. Fam. L. 629-60 Summer '94-'95.

Competency to Stand Trial of Criminal Defendant Diagnosed as "Mentally Retarded"--modern Cases, 23 ALR4th 493.

Criminal Responsibility, 22 Mental & Physical Disability L. Rep. 29, January/February, 1998

De Facto Departures From Insanity Instructions, Finkel, 14 L. and Human Behavior 105, April 1990.

Direction on Violent Disorder [Great Britain], Coutts, 54 J.Crim.L. 428, Nov. 1990.

Federal Jury Instructions and the Consequences of a Successful Insanity Defense, 93 Colum. L. Rev. 1223 (1993).

Inferring the Criminal Mind: Toward a Bridge Between Legal Doctrine and Psychological Understanding, Severance, Goodman and Loftus, 20 J.Crim.L. 107, Mar.-Apr. 1992.

Insanity of Accused at Time of Commission of Offense, Not Raised at Trial, as Ground for Habeas Corpus or Coram Nobis after Conviction, 29 ALR2d 703.

The Insanity Plea in Mississippi: A Primer and a Proposal, Smith, 10 Miss. College L.Rev. 147, Spring 1990.

Instruction as to Presumption of Continuing Insanity in Criminal Case, 27 ALR2d 121.

Instructions in State Criminal Case in Which Defendant Pleads Insanity as to Hospital Confinement in Event of Acquittal, 81 ALR4th 659.

Instructions Where Defendant Pleads Insanity as to His Hospital Confinement in the Event of Acquittal, 11 ALR3d 737; 81 ALR4th 659.

Jury Instructions Not Needed to Explain Guilty But Mentally Ill Verdict (Annual Survey of S. Carolina Law: Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 1987) Westbrook, 40 S. Carolina 64, Autumn 1988.

Massive Psychic Trauma, Krystal, (International Univ. Press, 1968).

Mental Irresponsibility, Burden and Sufficiency of Proof of, 17 ALR3d 146.

Mentally Retarded Offender -- No Independent Person at Interview -- Confession -- Necessity to Warn Jury of Need for Caution [Great Britain] Cowan and Birch, Crim.L.Rev. 813, Nov. 1989.

Modern Status of Rules as to Burden and Sufficiency of Proof of Mental Irresponsibility in Criminal Case, 17 ALR3d 146.

Modern Status of Test of Criminal Responsibility--federal Cases, 56 ALR Fed. 326.

Modern Status of Test of Criminal Responsibility--state Cases, 9 ALR4th 526.

The `Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity' Verdict: Should Juries Be Informed of Its Consequences? M. Bach, student author. 16 Whittier L. Rev. 645-83, 1995.

Parricide and Mental Illness: A Study of 12 Cases. F. Millaud et al., Int'l J.L. & Psychiatry 173-82 Spring 1996.

The Physiology and Pathology of Exposure to Stress, Selye, (Acta., Inc., 1950).

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and the Death Penalty. D.D. Burke and M.A. Nixon, 38 How. L.J. 183-99 Fall 1994.

Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and the Disposition to Criminal Behavior, Wilson and Zigelbaum, [Figley, ed.] Trauma and its Wake, Brunner/Mazel, 1986.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, [Kaplan and Sadock, ed.] Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, Andreason, (4th Ed.) Williams & Wilkins, 1985.

Presumption of Continuing Insanity as Applied to Accused in Criminal Case, 27 ALR2d 121.

The Psychological Consequences of Overwhelming Life Experiences, Psychological Trauma, van der Kolk, American Psychological Press, 1987.

Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers,Melton, Petrila, Poythress and Slobogin, (Guilford Press, 1987).

Release of One Committed to Institution as Consequence of Acquittal of Crime on Ground of Insanity, 95 ALR2d 54.

Should The Jury Be Instructed As To The Consequences Of A Successful Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity Verdict? A Comment On Shannon v. United States (94) 114 SCt 2419, N.M. Miles 30 New Eng. L. Rev. 749-77, Spr. 1996.

The Social Construction of Criminal Responsibility and Insanity, Roberts and Golding, 15 L. and Human Behavior 349, Aug. 1991.

Statutory Changes and the Insanity Defense: Seeking the Perfect Insane Person, G.L. Blau, R.A. Pasewark, 18 Law & Psychol. Rev. 69-108 Spring '94.

The Three Faces Of Evil: Jekyll on Trial: Multiple Personality Disorder & Criminal Law. By Elyn R. Saks with Stephen H. Behnke (New York: New York University Press. 1997) Sherry F. Colb, 86 Geo.  L.J.  677,  January 1998.

The Traumatic Neuroses of War, Kardiner, Hoeber, 1941.

Wrong Should not be Defined When Instructing the Jury on the Insanity Defense, State v. Crenshaw (Wash. 1983) 659 p.2d 488, Brownlow, 19 Gonzaga L.Rev. 453, Spring 1983.

THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

VOLUME 18 - CHAPTER 305

See also NCJIC Research Notes 305.8.1 [Hate Crimes].

Riggs, Punishing the Politically Incorrect Offender Through "Bias Motive" Enhancements: Compelling Necessity or First Amendment Folly?, 21 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 945-57, 1995.

THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

VOLUME 18 - CHAPTER 305

See also NCJIC Research Notes 305.19.10 [Supplemental Instructions].

Criminal Procedure (Jury Instructions) [California Supreme Court Survey, Jan. - Mar. 1989], 17 Pepperdine L.Rev. 282, Dec. 1989.

Necessity for Trial Judge to Make Communications to Jury as a Whole [Great Britain] Starke, 62 Australian L.J. 566, July 1988.

Objections to Instructions: When Does Trial Court's Noncompliance with Requirement of Rule 30, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, That Opportunity Shall Be Given to Make Objection to Instructions upon Request, out of Presence of Jury, Constitute Prejudicial Error, 55 ALR Fed 726.

Pretrial Conference Instructions Affected by Court's Order Entered After, 22 ALR3d 601.

Proposed Action: Court's Duty to Inform Counsel of Proposed Action on Requested Instructions under Rule 30 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 40 ALR Fed 495.

"What Do We Do Now?": Helping Juries Apply The Instructions. C.N. May, 28 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 869-901 April 1995.

THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

VOLUME 18 - CHAPTER 305

Admissibility of Expert Testimony as to Whether Accused Had Specific Intent Necessary for Conviction, 16 ALR4th 666.

Has Ohio Abandoned Allowing the Jury to Determine Whether Voluntary Intoxication Negatives Specific Intent? [case note: State v. Hicks (Ohio 1989) 538 N.E.2d 1030, Sosnowski, 18 Ohio Northern U. L.Rev. 179, Winter 1991.

Ignorance of the Law as an Excuse, 86 Colum.L.Rev. 1392, 1413 (1986).

Offence of Specific Intent -- Foresight of Risk of Act by Co-Defendant Outside Scope of Agreement -- Direction to Jury [Great Britain] Smith and Knapman, Crim. L.Rev. 616, Sept. 1988.

Presumptions of Intent (1986 Annual Survey of Massachusetts Law: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Significant Developments in the Law of Massachusetts from Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 1986) Clancy, 33 Annual Survey of Mass. L. 62, Annual 1986.

THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

VOLUME 18 - CHAPTER 305

The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process by Susan Berk-seligson. Language and Legal Discourse Series, the University of Chicago Press, 9-Sum Crim. Just. 48, 1994, Department 1990, David L. Lewis.

Court Interpreters: Standards of Practice and Standards for Training, 6 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 645, Spring 1997, Franklyn P. Salimbene.

Disinterring the "Good" and "Bad Immigrant": A Deconstruction of the State Court Interpreter Laws for Non-English-Speaking Criminal Defendants, 45 U. Kan. L. Rev. 837 (1997).

Finding the Right Expert Interpreters and Translators Are Not the Same, 55-Jun Or. St. B. Bull. 19, June, 1995, Lourdes Galvan-Sather.

From Hear My Voice: Reconfiguring the Right to Testify to Encompass the Defendant's Choice of Language, 16 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 545, 600.

Language-qualifying" Juries to Exclude Bilingual Speakers, 66 Brook. L. Rev. 1181 (2001).

Protecting the Rights of Linguistic Minorities: Challenges to Court Interpretation Protecting the Rights of Linguistic Minorities: Challenges to Court Interpretation, 19 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 193, 221.

Protecting the Rights of Linguistic Minorities: Challenges to Court Interpretation Protecting the Rights of Linguistic Minorities: Challenges to Court Interpretation, 30 New Eng.L. Rev. 227 (1996).

Right of accused to have evidence or court proceedings interpreted, 36 A.L.R.3d 276.

Right of accused to have evidence or court proceedings interpreted, because accused or other participant in proceeding is not proficient in the language used, 32 A.L.R.5th 149.

The Role of Counsel and the Courts in Addressing Foreign Language and Cultural Barriers at Different Stages of a Criminal Proceeding, 19 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 193 (1997).

Speaking the Language of Exclusion: How Equal Protection and Fundamental Rights Analyses Permit Language Discrimination, 28 St. Mary's L. J. 149 (1996).

What Kind of Hearing? Some Thoughts on Due Process for the Non-English- Speaking Criminal Defendant, 24 T. Marshall L. Rev. 251 (1999).

Texts:

Hollander & Bergman, Everytrial Criminal Defense Resource Book 75-1-7 (West, 1999).

HAWAII PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS - CRIMINAL, HAWJIC 1.02 (West, 1998).

UNIFORM CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS (OREGON), UCrJI 1001A  (Oregon State Bar, 1998).

THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

VOLUME 18 - CHAPTER 305

    305.9.11    Intoxication And Criminal Liability

Drug Addiction or Related Mental State as Defense to Criminal Charge, 73 ALR3d 16.

Drunkenness -- Effect on Intent to do Grievous Bodily Harm -- Mistaken Belief that Attack Necessary in Self-Defence Induced by Drunkenness -- Proper Direction to Jury [Great Britain] Rees and Smith, Crim.L.Rev. 135, Feb. 1991.

Effect of Voluntary Drug Intoxication upon Criminal Responsibility, 73 ALR3d 98.

Halcion Made Me Do It: New Liability and a New Defense - Fear and Loathing in the Halcion Paper Chase, 62 U. Cin. L. Rev. 603 (1993).

Has Ohio Abandoned Allowing the Jury to Determine Whether voluntary Intoxication Negatives Specific Intent? [case note: State v. Hicks (Ohio 1989) 538 N.E.2d 1030, Sosnowski, 18 Ohio Northern U. L.Rev. 179, Winter 1991.

Implicit Redefinitions, Evidentiary Proscriptions, and Guilty Minds: Intoxicated Wrongdoers After Montana v. Egelhoff, Brett G. Sweitzer, 146 U. Pa. L. Rev. 269, November, 1997.

Modern Status of the Rules as to Voluntary Intoxication as Defense to Criminal Charge, 8 ALR3d 1236.

Montana v. Egelhoff: Abandoning a Defendant's Fundamental Right To Present A Defense, Jeffrey Scott Robinette, 46 Cath. U. L. Rev. 1349, Summer 1997.

Montana v. Egelhoff: Voluntary Intoxication, Morality, and the Constitution, Robert J. McManus, 46 Am. U. L. Rev. 1245, April, 1997.

Problems with Prozac: A Defective Product Responsible for Criminal Behavior?, 10 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 359 (1999).

Article: Protecting Society and Defendants Too: the Constitutional Dilemma of Mental Abnormality and Intoxication Defenses, 53 Fordham L. Rev. 221 (1984).

When Intoxication Deemed Involuntary, 30 A.L.R. 761.

When Intoxication Deemed Involuntary So as to Constitute a Defense to Criminal Charge, 73 ALR3d 195.

Texts:

LaFave & Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, (West, 1999 Supp.) §§ 4.10(ee), (f).

Robinson, Criminal Law Defenses, (1999 Pocket Part) § 176 pp. 337-46.

Wharton’s Criminal Evidence, (West, 15th Ed. 1997) § 2:17, pp. 96-97.

Wharton’s Criminal Law, (15th Ed. 1994) § 113, pp. 125-30.