THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION
COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information
VOLUME 15 - CHAPTER 298
Go to
Volume
15 Table of Contents - Go to Chapter
298 Table of Contents
298.2 Standard Of Review On Federal Habeas
298.2.1 Standard Of Review On Federal Habeas: General Principles
298.2.2 Standard Of Review On Federal Habeas: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION
COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information
VOLUME 15 - CHAPTER 298
298.2.1 Standard Of Review On Federal Habeas: General Principles
RESEARCH NOTES:
See Capital Punishment Handbook [1.16.1 Trial Error vs. Structural Error].
See also Capital Punishment Handbook [1.16.2. Direct vs. Collateral Review of Trial Error].
See also Capital Punishment Handbook [1.16.3a. Appellate Review Of Federal Habeas Corpus: General Principles And Authorities].
See also Capital Punishment Handbook [3.1a. Standard Of Collateral Review For Constitutional Trial Errors: General Principles And Authorities].
See also Capital Punishment Handbook [5.1 a. Federal Death Penalty Crimes: General Principles And Authorities].
THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTION
COMPENDIUM
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information
VOLUME 15 - CHAPTER 298
298.2.2 Standard Of Review On Federal Habeas: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
PRACTICE NOTE: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel (IAC) under the 6th Amendment of the federal constitution is cognizable on federal habeas under the Antiterrorism Act because it is contrary to clearly established federal law per Strickland v. Washington (1984) 466 US 668 [104 SCt 2052; 80 LEd2d 674]. (Baylor v. Estelle (9th Cir. 1996) 94 F3d 1321, 1324; see also Ayala v. Speckard (2d Cir. 1996) 89 F3d 91, 96.) This interpretation of the revised habeas standard suggests that the "contrary to clearly established federal law" requirement refers to the general nature of the constitutional violation rather than the specific manner in which the constitution was violated.
RESEARCH NOTES:
See Capital Punishment Handbook [ 1.16.1 Trial Error vs. Structural Error].
See also Capital Punishment Handbook [ 1.16.2. Direct vs. Collateral Review of Trial Error].
See also Capital Punishment Handbook [1.16.3a. Appellate Review Of Federal Habeas Corpus: General Principles And Authorities].
See also Capital Punishment Handbook [3.1a. Standard Of Collateral Review For Constitutional Trial Errors: General Principles And Authorities].
See also Capital Punishment Handbook [5.1 a. Federal Death Penalty Crimes: General Principles And Authorities].