FORECITE National™
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

 VOLUME 11 - CHAPTER 257
Go to Volume 11 Table of Contents  -  Go to Chapter 257 Table of Contents

257.3 Entrapment

    257.3.8 Appeal

    257.3.8.1 Invalid Entrapment Instruction As Plain Error
    257.3.8.2 Entrapment: Failure To Instruct As Reversible Error Per Se

FORECITE National™
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

 VOLUME 11 - CHAPTER 257

PRACTICE NOTE: See U.S. v. Burt (9th Cir. 1998) 143 F3d 1215, 1219.

See generally, FORECITE National™ 305.1.12 [Appeal].

See FORECITE National™ 257.3.1.1 [Entrapment: Federal Test].

FORECITE National™
Instructions And Issues Omitted By The Pattern Instructions
Copyright & Publication Information

 VOLUME 11 - CHAPTER 257

PRACTICE NOTE: It is reversible error to refuse to instruct jury that when defense of entrapment is raised. (State v. Bean (AZ 1978) 581 P2d 257, 259; see also Sebastian v. Commonwealth (KY 1979) 585 SW2d 440 ; State v. Bisson (ME 1985) 491 A2d 544, 546; U.S. v. Timberlake (5th Cir. 1977) 559 F2d 1375, 1379-80; Hollis v. Gomez (CIV-90-0904 GEB) [refusal to instruct upon entrapment was reversible error per se].)

OPINION AVAILABLE: To read the Hollis opinion, click here. [Opinion Bank # O-312].

See generally, FORECITE National™ 305.1.12 [Appeal].

See generally, FORECITE National™ 305.5.6 [Entrapment].

See also generally, FORECITE National™ 305.5.4 [Entrapment].

See FORECITE National™ 257.3.1.1 [Entrapment: Federal Test].