A MANUAL OF JURY TRIAL PROCEDURES
- 2004
Go to Federal
Manuals Table of Contents - Go to Procedures
Table of Contents
Chapter Two: Jury Selection
2.9 Peremptory Challenges
A.
Civil
B. Criminal
A MANUAL OF JURY TRIAL PROCEDURES - 2004
A. Peremptory Challenges: Civil
Rule 47(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., refers to 28 USC 1870 as establishing the number of civil peremptory challenges. Section 1870 specifies that each party is entitled to three peremptory challenges; where there are several defendants or plaintiffs in a case, for purposes of determining each side's peremptory challenges, the court may allow additional peremptory challenges to each side and permit the challenges to be exercised separately or jointly.
Because there are no alternate jurors in civil cases, there is no provision for additional peremptory challenges based upon alternates.
A MANUAL OF JURY TRIAL PROCEDURES - 2004
B. Peremptory Challenges: Criminal
1.
Number of Peremptory ChallengesRule 24(b), Fed. R. Crim. P., provides the following peremptory challenges:
|
Type of Criminal Case |
Peremptory Challenges |
|
Any offense punishable by death |
20 per side |
|
Any offense punishable by imprisonment for more than one year |
government 6; defendant(s) 10 |
|
Any offense punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year or by a fine, or both |
3 per side |
The joinder of two or more misdemeanor charges for trial does not entitle a defendant to ten peremptory challenges.
See United States v. Machado, 195 F.3d 454, 457 (9th Cir. 1999).2.
Additional Peremptory Challenges–Where Alternates to Be ImpaneledRule 24(c), Fed. R. Crim. P., also specifies the number of peremptory challenges to prospective alternate jurors:
|
No. of Alternates To Be Impaneled |
Number of Peremptory Challenges |
|
1 or 2 |
1 peremptory challenge in addition to those otherwise allowed |
|
3 or 4 |
2 peremptory challenges to each side, in addition to those otherwise allowed |
|
5 or 6 |
3 peremptory challenges to each side, in addition to those otherwise allowed |
The additional peremptory challenges may be used against alternate jurors only. Fed. R. Crim. P. 24(c)(4).
3.
Additional Peremptory Challenges–Multiple DefendantsThere is no right to additional peremptory challenges in multiple defendant cases. Rule 24(b), Fed. R. Crim. P., makes award of additional challenges permissive. Furthermore, disagreement between codefendants on the exercise of joint peremptory challenges does not mandate a grant of additional challenges, unless the defendants demonstrate that the jury ultimately selected is not impartial or representative of the community.
United States v. McClendon, 782 F.2d 785, 788 (9th Cir. 1986).